Wildlife Management Technologies
Surrogate
Propagation
In response to nationally diminishing numbers in the native quail
population, hunters and wildlife enthusiasts have attempted to give
quail a boost by developing ways of introducing pen raised quail
into the wild.
 Baby pheasant chicks
Quail release systems rose in popularity in the 1970’s, as
quail numbers everywhere began a noticeable decline. All were used
with very limited success due to three consistent problems. The released
birds suffered high losses due to predation. Any surviving birds
tended to move away from the release area, and were unable to be
recovered. Finally, any birds that did remain displayed extremely
poor flight performance.
Through the years there have been countless remakes and “refinements” of
these methods. While there have been occasional circumstances that
proved better than others, the success rate has averaged between
0-3%. There have been some reports of success as high as 9%.
In 1979, while working with a hunt club, we began using release
systems in an effort to help our clients have a larger huntable population
of quail on their properties. Between 1979 and 1990, we released
nearly one million quail throughout Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas, with
virtually zero success. In the early 90’s, we wondered if perhaps
there was something we were overlooking in the release method. Were
pen-raised quail themselves flawed or was it the release method that
was still not perfected?
 Quail
chicks in unit
We noted that in all three systems quail were raised in a facility,
until they were nine weeks of age or older, transported from where
they were raised then released in an altogether different location.
We started at what we believed to be the very beginning. What was
the difference between native and pen raised birds? We began a series
of experiments comparing day-old pen raised quail to day-old native
quail.
By using day-old quail, we were experimenting with birds that had
not been influenced by captivity. Native quail eggs were placed in
an incubator and hatched out. They were then taken in total isolation
to a prepared one-acre pen. From behind a screen, the native day-old
chicks were released into the grass. For thirty minutes, their behavior
was as expected: pecking and feeding on insects. After thirty minutes,
we leapt from behind the screen, whistling and disrupting them in
order to record their reaction. Not surprisingly, the day-old native
birds reacted to the stimuli by scattering and hiding motionless
in the grass. After about 1 ½ minutes they began their “lost
chick” call and slowly emerged from hiding to resume their
former activities of feeding and pecking. After considerable repetition,
we concluded that, in every case, native day-old chicks responded
to stimuli by hiding and becoming motionless. This was a favorable
trait bred over hundreds of years to increase their chances of survival
from predation.
 Surrogator™ with 3 day old Pheasant Chicks
The next test group consisted of eggs obtained from a respected
game bird breeder. Twenty-five eggs were placed in an incubator and
hatched out. Upon hatching and drying they were removed, in total
isolation, from the incubator. They were taken to a separate one-acre
pen and released from behind a screen. We observed their behavior
for thirty minutes. The pen-raised offspring displayed behavior that
was identical to the native birds. After thirty minutes, we leapt
from behind a screen, whistling and behaving disruptively in order
to record their reaction. To our surprise, their behavior was identical
to that of their native cousins.
Frankly, we were surprised by this reaction from the pen-raised
offspring. There had been no discernable difference between the native
offspring and the pen-raised offspring. Both knew instinctively how
to survive by hiding and remaining motionless and quiet until danger
passed. It was obvious that a few generations raised in a pen could
not dilute hundreds of generations of native behavior. It was also
obvious that both test groups possessed survival instincts at one
day of age. What was happening between one day of age and sixteen
weeks of age to cause birds to lose their survival instincts?
Chicks
in unit by feed trough
For sixteen weeks each group was tested weekly for their reaction
to stimuli. Conditions for both test groups were identical. Both
were isolated in a facility with little to no human contact. At the
fourth week we noticed some changes in both test groups. A few birds
in each test group began to respond more slowly to the stimuli. There
was a continual deterioration of reaction to stimuli, each subsequent
week until the birds reached nine weeks of age, at which time 70-75%
of them no longer reacted to the stimuli.
When their athleticism was measured, the native birds proved to
be more athletic. When pressed harder in the later stages of the
experiment, their flight maneuverability was greater than the pen
raised stock. We could only speculate that this is due to the natural
selection process that occurs in the native population.
We further concluded that quail raised in a pen develop both behavioral
and physical problems that reduce their survivability in the wild.
The behavioral problems developed as a result of atrophying of survival
instincts. All quail, even offspring of pen-raised birds, are born
with survival instincts. The “taming” of these birds
when kept in captivity past the age of about five weeks dramatically
affects their survivability in the wild.
The physical problems pen-raised quail develop also affect a quail’s
survivability. Birds raised in a pen have lower physical activity
than native birds, as well as easy access to plentiful food. This
leads to, what we refer to as, the “feed-lot” syndrome.
These birds are too heavy and too physically out of shape to elude
danger, even if they were so inclined. They also retain moisture
in their feathers at a greater volume than their native counterparts.
This makes them more susceptible to chilling, leading to higher mortality
than native quail.
Further research revealed evidence that quail possess a homing instinct.
In one study, quail fitted with telemetry equipment have been tracked
traveling forty miles only to return to within a few yards of the
trapping location. We spent some time with some experts who had successfully
established ducks and geese on new bodies of water, using the homing
instinct. By clipping the wings of the parent ducks or geese, the
experts were able to ensure their nesting location. The birds followed
their normal migratory patterns and flew south, but when they returned
north, both parents and offspring returned to their respective birthplaces.
In this manner, new flocks were established on specific bodies of
water. This provided us with critical information about raising birds
from one day of age on a specific location and was a vital step to
our success.
 Surrogator™ placed in CRP field
Armed with this new information, we developed a patented system
called Surrogate Propagation™. To combat leaving an area, we
instilled a home range in quail by raising them on location and imprinting
them to a piece of property. We took day old quail, placed them in
a piece of equipment that provided food, water, warmth and protection
for the first five weeks of life, the time in life when they are
most vulnerable.
To reduce their susceptibility to predators we released the birds
at five weeks of age while they still possessed survival instincts.
We released them during the summer months when cover was good, insects
were plentiful and predation on quail was minimal.
It appeared that the physical problems fixed themselves, by releasing
the birds at five weeks of age. The “Surrogated” quail
were not turning their food into fat stores, but instead using it
to grow. Their body weight, when compared to pen raised birds from
the same hatch, was less. By the age of ten weeks, birds released
from The Surrogator™ also showed a greater ability to repel water
than their pen raised siblings.
Forty-five tests were conducted in Oklahoma and Texas. Of these,
43 were successful and two were not. Both failures, one in
Catoosa, OK and one in San Angelo, TX, occurred when five-week-old
birds were released later than recommended, in the middle of November.
A cold front passed through, dropping temperatures down in the 30’s
and bringing three days of rain. Five-week-old birds are not mature
enough to weather such harsh condition.
In 2006, our clients released around 300,000 quail in over 30 states
from The Surrogator™ units. A random survey conducted a few years
ago indicated an average of 65% survival. The highest was over 90%.
 Surrogator™ placed next to Magnet Mix Food Plot site in CRP
Unexpectedly, we soon learned of a tremendously exciting by-product
of the use of the Surrogate Propagation system. Clients were experiencing
successful reproduction of birds released from The Surrogator™. An
example of this occurred on a 17,000-acre ranch in Catoosa, Oklahoma,
known to have very few quail. Forty-four banded birds were released
from a Surrogator™ unit in June. We used Tennessee Reds, a bird with
unique markings and coloration, in an effort to determine any successful
reproduction. Upon our return to the area, January 28th, 19 months
later, we located seven coveys of quail in 2 ½ hours and recovered
thirty-six. Of the 36 recovered, each one had the Tennessee Red markings
and all were unbanded, proving that these were in fact offspring
of the birds released from The Surrogator™ unit.
In 2003, we started implementing this successful system with ringneck
pheasants. Like quail, pheasants are experiencing severe declines
over much of their home range. After several years the results
have shown that the surrogate propagation system has proven to work
equally as well with pheasants.
In addition to bobwhite quail and pheasants, the Surrogate Propagation
system has proven to be tremendously successful with blue (scaled)
quail and chukar. Future experiments with grouse and
partridge are planned. For more information, visit www.quailrestoration.com or www.pheasantrestoration.com,
or call 316-200-0134.

5
week old quail flying from surrogator™
|